Case study 05

From mass to class: can a value brand stretch to premium?

India’s dominant dairy cooperative wants an experiential café format. The strategic question isn’t whether the ice cream is good — it’s whether a brand built on affordability can charge for atmosphere.

Context: IIM Bangalore · Product Strategy & Management
Year: 2025
Contribution: Team project · Group 11 (5 members)
Frameworks: Customer Value Map · BCG · Ansoff · Kano · SWOT · primary survey

What this is: IIM Bangalore coursework — a strategy exercise on a public company, built from public information and the team’s own consumer survey. Not affiliated with, commissioned by, or endorsed by Amul or GCMMF. No internal company data was used.

Team project — individual contribution detail to be added.

The base you’d be stretching

Figures as stated in the deck, sourced from public reporting.
Dairy market share	Farmer members	Milk collected daily	Brand value rank
> 60%	3.6 M	32 M litres	17th

Timeline: founded as a cooperative in 1946 → world’s first buffalo-milk powder in 1955 → diversification into ice cream and chocolate in the mid-1990s → first Amul Ice Lounge in 2019.

Primary research: what the brand actually means

The team ran its own consumer survey. Four attributes came back — and every one of them is a reason the premium stretch is hard.

Purity & qualityAffordabilityTrust & reliabilityNational pride

The brand is trusted, pure and affordable. Premium positioning has to be built on the first three without contradicting the fourth.

Reading of the survey result

Outside: why the opening exists

Rising disposable income and a growing middle class.
Dine-out culture — a shift toward paying for experiences over products.
Social media amplifying the sharing of dining experiences.
Tier-I and Tier-II urban markets with premium-location lounge potential.
The proof point: local artisanal cafés in Tier-I/II cities already show a significant segment will pay a substantial premium for a superior, unique experience.

Positioned on a Customer Value Map — market-perceived quality against market-perceived price — to locate where a premium lounge could credibly sit.

Inside: what a lounge has to get right

Kano split of the experience — the delighters are where a premium price is earned.

Basic

Expected

Product purity and quality (the core strength) · seating, lighting, air conditioning · cleanliness and hygiene · standard scoops available.

Performance

More is better

Number of flavour options · speed of service · price competitiveness · comfort and availability of seating.

Excitement

Delighters

Fusion desserts (e.g. a Gulab Jamun sundae) · “Instagrammable” ambiance and decor · exceptionally personalized service · inventive presentation.

The lounge was also placed on a BCG matrix (relative market share × market growth) and an Ansoff matrix — the Ice Lounge reads as product development / market development off an existing cash-cow dairy base.

SWOT — the two that matter

Strengths

Unparalleled brand trust and perception of purity
Strong supply chain and dairy product expertise
Strong perceived value-for-money positioning

Weaknesses

Franchise-led ‘access’ model — inconsistent customer experience and ambiance
The brand-stretch problem — a mass-market image that may dilute the credibility of a premium positioning

Opportunities

Leverage trust to introduce a wider range of innovative dairy desserts
High growth in Tier-2/3 cities with less competition and even stronger brand equity

Threats

Intense competition from specialised, quality-driven players better positioned on experience
Consumer shift toward lifestyle, health-conscious and “Instagrammable” brands

Where it lands: three questions, not one answer

The question	The paths
Identity What do we want the Ice Lounge to be?	Path A: embrace the mass market — “the Maruti of cafés.” Path B: pursue a premium niche — “the Nexa experience.” …or something different.
Brand stretch How far can the Amul brand stretch?	A: status quo, master brand (“Amul Ice Lounge”). B: a sub-brand (e.g. “Amul’s Verve”). C: an endorsed brand (“Verve, by Amul”).
Competency How do we build the capabilities to win?	A: build internally — a new retail division within GCMMF. B: buy a small regional café chain. C: partner or joint-venture with a hospitality group or design firm.

Stated plainly: the deck deliberately ends on the framing rather than picking a path — it presents the choice architecture and stops. My own read on which path to take is pending, and is not claimed here.

← All case studies Next: A two-sided marketplace for amateur sport →